Covid-19 Research


The highly confidential Pfizer documents, which have been synonymous with the extreme lack of transparency revealed by the actions of pivotal governmental agencies, over the past 20 months, lead critics of the official narrative to demand “show us the data,” is finally being revealed–well sort of, the first few hundred redacted pages out of a trove of 451,000.

In pediatric individuals < 12 years of age, which was originally missing from Pfizer’s analysis, 34 cases were reported with 24 categorized as serious. The fact young children were administered the Pfizer vaccine raises concern since emergency use authorization was not awarded to the company to administer to the pediatric population at that time. Moreover, the age range raised considerable alarm given its ‘from 2 months to 9 years.’ The report lacks data on how many children in total were administered the vaccine, hence, there is no way of calculating incidence rates to extrapolate a meaningful analysis.

A FOIA request has been issued by a group of over 30 scientists and academics who filed a civil action lawsuit against the agency because they failed to fully comply with the request, since less than 1% of the documentation was released and with the FDA taking the position that all the data would be shared by 2076. Subsequently, the governmental agency had the audacity to push the date back even further to 2096. This was due to their recent disclosure of the existence of thousands of additional pages, totaling 451,000 versus the originally stated 320,000 pages. However, the rate at which the FDA is willing to release the documentation has not changed and remains at 500 pages a month. It’s worth noting that it took the FDA only 108 days to review all of Pfizer’s documentation before authorizing the Pfizer BNT162B2 vaccine for emergency authorization use on December 1, 2020.

From Pfizer’s own documents:

In Table 7 of pages 16-17, 1403 cases of Cardiovascular AESIs (Adverse Event of Specific Interest) were reported and segmented by the following: Arrhythmia; Cardiac Failure; Cardiac failure acute; Cardiogenic shock; Coronary artery disease; Myocardial infarction; Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; Stress cardiomyopathy; Tachycardia.

The relevant event onset latency ranged from less than 24 hours to 21 days. This means that relevant events occurred from any time less than 24 hours up to 21 days of receiving the vaccine, with a median of less than 24 hours. 136 relevant event outcomes were fatal. Therefore, 50% of these relevant outcomes (including deaths) occurred less than 24 hours after receiving the vaccine. This points again to vaccine death causality.  

Initial 38-page released document:

FDA Produces the First 91+ pages of Documents from Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine File

Two months and one day after it was sued, and close to 3 months since it licensed Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, the FDA released the first round of documents it reviewed before licensing this product.  The production consisted of 91 pdf pages, one xpt file, and one txt file. You can download them here.

Epidemiology of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines in Ontario, Canada: by vaccine product, schedule and interval
Sarah A. Buchan, PhD1,2,3, Chi Yon Seo, MSc1, Caitlin Johnson, MPH1, Sarah Alley, MPH1, Jeffrey C. Kwong, MD, Sharifa Nasreen, PhD, Andrew Calzavara, MSc, Diane Lu, MD, Tara M. Harris, MHSc, Kelly
Yu, MPH, Sarah E. Wilson, MD

1. Public Health Ontario, ON, Canada
2. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
3. ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
4. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
5. University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Objective, Evidence-based Websites

Aaron Siri – Inecting Freedom

Managing Partner of Siri & Glimstad, has extensive complex civil litigation experience, including civil rights involving mandated medicine, class actions, and high stakes disputes.

The context surrounding PHMPT’s FOIA request is truly unprecedented, and the request should be treated as such.  Historically, there has been no consumer product that the federal government has mandated Americans to receive.  Now, it has mandated Pfizer’s vaccine to private sector employees, federal employees, the military, and more.  States have done the same at the urging of the federal government, extending mandates for people to enter schools, universities, restaurants, and public venues, among other places.  A majority of Americans are now mandated to receive this product under penalty of losing a job or worse.  This is truly unparalleled in the nation’s past.  There has never been such a large-scale mandate of any product for society, let alone one that is injected into people.  Even school mandates under state laws have almost always included an easy to obtain exemption.  The current inability to say “no” to injecting a product into one’s body absent serious consequences dictated by the government is truly unprecedented.

Making this even more unprecedented is that Americans, if injured, cannot sue Pfizer and otherwise have no recourse.  There is virtually no other product where a consumer is prohibited from suing the company that manufactures, markets, and profits from the product.  Decoupling a company’s profit interest from its interest in safety is a moral hazard, and a departure from centuries of product liability doctrine.  Yet we find ourselves in this truly extraordinary circumstance where not only must Americans take this product under penalty of expulsion from work, school, the military and civil life, but they cannot sue Pfizer for any resulting injuries.